Posthumous Democrazy

I guess we had to destroy democracy in order to save it. Welcome to my experiment in post traumatic political blogging for voters and other living creatures. Feel free to add comments and share your thoughts with your friends, your friends' friends, your old college roommate, your former spouse, your parents, your Senators and Representatives, your local media, Fox news, and the President.

My Photo
Name:
Location: You Better Watch Out, United States

I think television killed intelligent discourse and Jeffersonian Democracy, but I'm too busy watching to do anything about it. In my spare time, I plan to save the world and its people from self-destruction by sharing insightful observations and dialogue (well, mostly late-night rants I spew out for the purpose of venting my spleen, or rather the place where my spleen used to be. It's up to you to provide the dialogue). Feel free to check out the site and comment on my musings, or my muse, who seems to be alternately satirical, whimsical, or just plain angry. I'm also looking to post some links to some of the spectacularly amusing (funny how that doesn't mean "without muse") entries I've stumbled across in a section called "Six degrees of blogging" or something even less original as examples of how to blog effectively (and by effectively, I mean either in a manner which is both interesting to random third parties and grammatically correct or by causing the casual reader to pass a cheese sandwich through his or her nose, thereby demonstrating the fundamentals of casual causality in an unforgettably painful, yet amusing fashion).

Thursday, February 07, 2008

A Quiet Revolution?

Maybe there's hope after all. The Will.i.am video for Obama is pretty cool. Apologies for duplicating the posting thereof, but if you haven't seen it yet, check this out:



I'm afraid the cynic in me is tempted to think this is all another example of style over substance. But, then again, imagery can be visceral and inspiring. And the smallest moments can remind us that there may still be a reason to vote, and to hope.


As I walked into the firehouse in my small, rural, upstate NY home town to cast my vote, I encountered a rare and wondrous sight. Twenty registered Democrats of all ages waiting in line to cast their votes in a primary election in an overwhelmingly Republican, predominantly white, working-class town. As we joked and chatted in line, wondering how the hell anyone was supposed to understand the fact that the delegate names on the ballot had nothing to do with the candidates whose names they appeared next to, a few Republicans sauntered in and sheepishly wandered over to their vacant sign-in table. Then, even though I found myself in a situation where my vote may have helped send a delegate one way or another in a year when that might actually make a difference, I still felt that my right to choose a candidate had been squelched by an unfair and undemocratic process – the names Kucinich and Edwards remained on the ballot, but I was a pragmatist for a day. By the time I had cast my vote, the queue had grown to forty in length and strength, with a line trailing out into the parking lot. I couldn't help feeling that the two-party system is an archaic charade that still forces me to choose the lesser of two evils, but I saw, and felt, a glimmer of hope for my neighbors and, dare I say, for the country.

Perhaps the most perspicacious Quotes of the Day from the local paper the day after:
Illinois Sen. Obama got 6,585 votes in the Democratic primary, while New York Sen. Hillary Clinton earned 4,631 in the county.


Forty-six percent of Democrats turned out for their primary while 28 percent of eligible Republicans voted.


A 46% turnout in a primary election? Maybe people care about this stuff, after all. I’m going out on a limb here and concluding that, based on a careful survey of absolutely no one, the sleeping giant that is the silent majority in this country has been awakened.



And the electorate is looking pretty good at the moment. They may still prefer to stay at home and watch reruns of Everybody Loves Seinfeld’s Friends than to actually get out, get involved, or write a letter to the editor, but they are, in fact, ready for change.

Maybe not as much change as I’d like to see – maybe they’re willing to waste another year or two in Iraq in the name of “safe transition” instead of going directly to “give peace a chance” or to continue to subsidize the health care and pharmaceutical conglomerates instead of reining in soaring health costs by nationalizing the insurance industry. But maybe, just maybe, this is part of an evolutionary, rather than revolutionary, change.


Maybe we will come out to vote. Maybe we’ll stay interested in the issues, maybe we’ll exert some influence over whichever of the two evil choices we’re stuck with. Yes, we can, indeed.

1 Comments:

Blogger whyaduck said...

I do bow to you, O King of Sanity Clause, who goes forth and does indeed ramble. We need a champion to inspire the revolution. Big shoes for Obama, but he DOES have the experience. Remember these guys are only as wise as their wisdom to trust advisors. And McCain wisdom to pick Palin as next with his actuarial statistics of one chance in 7 that he won't make it alive through his first term (I can twist statistcs) demonstrates his patriotism at the moment is woefully inadequate for the position

1:10 PM  

Post a Comment

<< Home